March 17, 2021
John argues in the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit on behalf of plaintiffs who have been unconstitutionaly excluded from Michigan's Redistricting Commission because of their own First Amendment-protected activities or those of family members. Audio is available here; Detroit News coverage is here.
March 8, 2021
The U.S. Supreme Court rules 8-1 in favor of Chike Uzuegbunam and Joseph Bradford, students who were stopped from sharing their faith on a public-university campus. John was lead draftsperson on the merits briefs for Alliance Defending Freedom. The opinion is available here.
February 23, 2021
The Detroit News interviews John about his latest U.S. Supreme Court case, Thomas More Law Center v. Becerra, involving compelled-donor disclosure in California. The story is available here.
December 28, 2020
John prevails in the Michigan Supreme court on behalf of private religious schools who were unlawfully discriminated against because of a Michigan constitutional provision prohibiting fuding to private schools. The opinion is available here.
November 10, 2020
John argues his 32nd case in the Michigan Supreme Court, on behalf of private religious schools that have been unconstitutionally denied state funding to reimburse them for state health and safety mandates. Detroit News coverage is avalable here. Additional Michigan coverage is here. The argument video is available here.
October 21, 2020
Bridge Magazine interviews John about the possibility of litigation over the 2020 election.
September 18, 2020
John is interviewed by the Detroit News about the life and legacy of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
September 10, 2020
John is interviewed to preview the Michigan Supreme Court's oral arguments involving the Governor's power to continue indefinitely her Covid-related emergency orders.
September 8, 2020
The United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan dismissed lawsuit against Bursch Law client the State Bar of Michigan dclaiming that the Michigan Bar's mandatory dues assessment violates attorneys' free-speech rights, and that require membeship as a condition to practice law violates attorneys' free-association rights). Law 360 coverage is available here.
June 11, 2020
The Michigan Court of Appeals issues a speedy decision agreeing with John's arguments in support of Enbridge regarding the validity of legislation authorizing a utility tunnel under the Straits of Mackinac for the Line 5 pipeline. Media coverage is available here.
June 3, 2020
John argues on behalf of Enbridge in the Michigan Court of Appeals in a case challenging the Michigan Attorney General's opinion that legislation authorizing a utility tunnel under the Straits of Mackinac for the Line 5 pipeline is somehow unconstitutional.
May 18, 2020
In response to Bursch Law motion to intervene and petition for rehearing en banc on behalf of the Michigan Senate and House, the 6th Circuit grants rehearing en banc and vacates panel opinion creating a purported fundamental right to a minimum level of educaiton. Details are available here and here.
May 7, 2020
The Michigan Senate and House retain John to file a motion to intervene and a petition for rehearing en banc in the 6th Circuit challenging a recent opinion creating a purported fundamental right to a minimum level of education. Coverage available here and here.
April 19, 2020
John appears on Fox and Friends to discuss new stay-in-place lawsuit against Michigan's Governor on behalf of the landscaping, lawn-care, and garden-center industries. The Governor later issues a revised executive order that lifted all restrictions on these businesses and allowed them to go back to work.
April 7, 2020
Bridge Magazine interviews John regarding the Michigan Governor's lack of authority to extend a disaster declaration beyond 28 days without approval of the Michigan Legislature.
March 17, 2020
John argues in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit on behalf of citizens challenging Michigan's newly created redistricting commission, which excludes these citizens from participating based on their constitutional protected speech and association. The telephonic-argument audio is available here.
March 16, 2020
Bursch Law files a cert. petition on behalf of the Tennessee General Assembly challenging the federal government's authority to compel the state to pay part of a federal program's costs even after the State has withdrawn from it. Coverage here.
March 13, 2020
John joined Grand Rapids Opera Artistic Director James Meena to discuss the musical styles of Scalia/Ginsburg and the special relationship between the Justices
March 11, 2020
John argues in the Michigan Supreme Court on behalf of the Michigan Senate and House in support of PA 608, a bill that adds protection for Michigan citizens in the ballot-petition process. The argument video is available here. Media coverage is here.
February 17, 2020
John's op-ed for The Hill regarding the vindication of constitutional rights is available here.
January 22, 2020
John is quoted in a New York Times report about his client, Tesla, and its favorable settlement with the State of Michigan involving the right to sell and service vechicles in the state. Additional coverage is available at Law 360.
January 22, 2020
Bloomberg interviews John to discuss Espinoza v. Montana Dept. of Revenue, a U.S. Supreme Court case involving the validity of state constitutional amendments that discriminate against religious organizations in school funding. John filed a friend-of-the-court brief in favor of the plaintiff families.
December 1, 2010
WoodTV8's Rick Albin interviews John on To The Point regarding the new, bi-partisan lawsuit to invalidate Michigan's harshesth-in-the-nation term limits.
December 1, 2019
An additional Michigan state representative and senator decide to join the bi-partisan legal effort to set aside Michigan's unreasonable term limits. Coverage available here.
November 20 2019
On behalf of a bipartisan group of eight former legislators and with a bi-partisan legal team, John files suit in federal court to invalidate Michigan's term limits, the most restrictive in the nation. There is extensive media coverage, including here, here, and here.
November 19, 2019
John files a motion in federal court on behalf of Michigan House of Representatives Speaker Lee Chatfield, seeking to block a testimonial trial subpoena based on legislative privilege. Coverage is available here.
November 7, 2019
John appears for his 30th Michigan Supreme Court argument, Rafaeli v. Oakland County. The case will decide whether a property owner who fails to pay their taxes and ignores two-plus years of delinquency notices has relinquished any right in their property or instead can assert a governmental taking when the foreclosing entity, acting as real estate agent, secures a higher sales price than the oustanding tax debt. Case information is available here.
October 24, 2019
John argues a $750 million commercial dispute in the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. The case involves a debtor's rights question: who owns the property in a revocable living trust?
October 8, 2019
John argues his 12th U.S. Supreme Court case, Harris Funeral Homes v. EEOC, on behalf of Alliance Defending Freedom clients Tom and Nancy Rost. Media coverage is abundant, including here and here.
September 16, 2019
John is a featured speaker at a Constiution Day event in D.C. sponsored by Jones Day addressing "A Supreme Court Preview on the Future of Title VII."
August 26, 2019
John files a cert. petition requesting that the U.S. Supreme Court agree to decide a case on behalf of Alliance Defending Freedom client the Thomas More Law Center that challenges the California Attorney General's blanket practice of requiring nonprofits who solicit in the State to disclose their major donors. Media coverage available here.
August 16, 2019
Working with Alliance Defending Freedom, John files a merits brief in the U.S. Supreme Court on behalf of Harris Funeral Homes in a dispute that asks the Court to decide the original public meaning of the word "sex" in Title VII, enacted in 1964. John's op-ed about the case and the filing is available here.
July 30, 2019
John files a lawsuit on behalf of a number of plaintiffs unlawfully excluded from Michigan's new, purportedly non-partisan redistricting commission based on the plaintiffs' speech and association. Michigan Public Radio covers the filing here.
July 18, 2019
John argues in the Michigan Supreme Court on behalf of the Michigan House and Senate, defending the Legislature's decision to "adopt and amend" a citizen ballot proposal involving sick leave and minimum wage. Coverage of the proceeding is available here.
June 26, 2019
The Minnesota Supreme Court issues a ruling that partially vindicates John's client, the recipient of a domestic-abuse-survivor award, by holding that the plaintiff failed to prove reputational damages and that the client did not act with malice as a matter of law. Star Tribune coverage availabe here.
June 20, 2019
The Wall Street Journal publishes John's op-ed regarding Washington State florist Barronelle Stutzman and her quest to preserve her and others religious liberty in the U.S. Supreme Court.
May 16, 2019
The Sixth Circuit issues a deeply divided opinion denying reheraing en banc, clearing the way for John to seek U.S. Supreme Court review for a decision holding that his clients, various officials of the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, do not have qualified immunity from civil suits in the Flint water cases. Coverage of the opinion is available here.
May 15, 2019
The USA Today interviews John to discuss the U.S. Supreme Court's practice of hearing a series of cases involving similar issues over multi-year periods.
May 10, 2019
The Kansas Supreme Court rules in favor of John's client and rejects the adoption of a commonlaw claim for dramshop liability. News coverage is available here.
April 22, 2019
A statistical analysis by Empircal SCOTUS shows that among frequent, non-government Supreme Court litigators, John is the 3rd most successful at persuading Justices to adopt his legal positions. The report and supporting data are available here.
March 25, 2019
The Univeristy of Michigan publicly reconsiders legacy-based admissions policies that John criticized in the U.S. Supreme Court in 2013 in the Schuette v. Coalition to Defend case. A summary of the issue is available here.
March 19, 2019
John argues in the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit on behalf of the State of Tennesee and its General Assembly regarding the constitutionality of a federal initiative that requires the State to pay for a federal program for which the State opted out. Additional information about the case is available here.
March 15, 2019
The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit becomes the first federal appellate court in the country to uphold a state law prohibiting the sale or transfer of aborted fetal body parts or tissue, an issue that John argued the previous fall on behalf of Indiana. Coverage is available here.
February 1, 2019
John is back in court defending Nick Lyon, Michigan's former Director of the Department of Health & Human Services, against manslaughter and other charges brought involving the Flint water crisis. The Detroit News reports on the hearing here.
December 12, 2018
John testifies in the Michigan Legislature in support of bills intended to eliminate fraud and ensure that ballot initiatives have broad support across the State before being presented to voters. News about the testimony is available here.
November 13, 2018
Bridge Magazine interview of John discussing the direction of the Michigan Supreme Court following the November 2018 election.
October 1, 2018
John argues libel case in the Minnesota Supreme Court in defense of a client, sued by her husband, who received a survivor's award from a domestic-abuse advocacy group. Media coverage of the case is available here.
September 13, 2018
Based on a statistical analysis, Empircal SCOTUS recognizes John as one of its regularly-appearing U.S. Supreme Court "all stars."
September 5, 2018
John argued in the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in defense of an Indiana law that prohibits the sale or transfer of aborted fetal body parts or tissue.
July 8, 2018
Crain's Detroit Business notes that State health director Nick Lyon has brought in John, "one of Michigan's legal big guns," to argue for dismissal of manslaughter charges brought as a result of the Flint water crisis.
July 6, 2018
The American Bar Journal reports on class-action lawsuits that Bursch Law has filed on behalf of teachers in California and New York, seeking the return of union agency fees unlawfully withheld from the teachers.
May 13, 2018
John represented the State of Michigan Department of Health & Human Services and persuaded the Court that the Department had not been falsifying child-welfare records, as a news report had suggested. Coverage is available here.
April 14, 2018
The Detroit News profiled a lawsuit John filed on behalf of a Catholic school, seeking to vindicate Michigan's appropriation of dollars to fund state-mandated health and safety regulations in spite of a Michigan Constitutional Amendment that unlawfully excludes religious schools from funding.
April 3, 2018
The Michigan Court of Appeals issued a ruling in favor of John's client, affirming dismissal of a wrongful-death claim based on negligent hiring, retention, or supervision of employees theories.
March 18, 2018
The USA Today quoted John in a story about the U.S. Supreme Court's upcoing arguments in a case involving California's compelled-speech requirements for pregnancy resource centers.
March 14, 2018
John won a ground-breaking ruling in federal court, compelling the Michigan Auto Dealers Association to turn over confidential documents as part of Tesla's lawsuit against the State of Michigan. News coverage is available here.
January 11, 2018
John appeared in federal court in Newark on behalf of the New Jersey Department of Children and Families with respect to the federal-court consent decree that govern's the State's child-welfare system.
January 8, 2018
Bursch Law filed a reply brief in support of its Supreme Court cert. petition regarding the elements of a hostile-environment claim against a union. The brief is available here.
December 21, 2017
Bursch Law filed a cert. petition asking the Supreme Court to resolve a circuit split regarding the proper test to apply when analyzing whether a federal scheme is sufficiently comprehensive to preclude a section 1983 claim asserting a constitutional violation for the same underlying conduct. The specific question is whether plaintiffs' section 1983 claims are precluded by the Safe Drinking Water Act. The petition is available here.
November 19, 2017
Great to see old friends and meet new ones at the Federalist Society 2017 National Lawyers Convention in Washington, DC.
November 8, 2017
John argued his second case of the Michigan Supreme Court Term, and 28th overall, in Marlette Auto Wash, LLC v. Van Dyke SC Properts, LLC, a real-estate dispute involving prescriptive easements.
November 3, 2017
This past June, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a 6-2 ruling in favor of Bursch Law client Jae Lee, a permanent legal resident of the United States who emigrated with his parents from Korea in 1982, and who has lived in the United States ever since. After being charged with a relatively small-time drug offense, Mr. Lee accepted a plea offer in exchange for a 9-11 month reduction in his sentencing exposure. Mr. Lee's decision was based almost exclusively on his attorney's advice that the plea would not lead to his deportation. But counsel had it exactly backward: the plea subjected Mr. Lee to mandatory, permanent banishment from the United States. After Mr. Lee served his one-year sentence -- and an additional six years in detention waiting for his habeas petition to be resolved -- he was allowed to withdraw his plea as a result of the Supreme Court's decision. But that was not the end of proceedings. Mr. Lee still had to negotiate a different plea or go to trial on the original charges. The rest of Mr. Lee's story has now concluded. The federal government did the right thing and moved to dismiss the charges against Mr. Lee. And just yesterday, the district court granted that motion and dismissed the indictment. Mr. Lee is now free to continue his career as a successful restauranteur in Memphis, Tennessee, and to care for his elderly parents, who live in New York. The Firm sends our best wishes to Mr. Lee and his extraordinary trial counsel, Pat McNally.
November 1, 2017
Bursch Law prevails in its Michigan Supreme Court litigation involving the interplay between Michigan's cap on public-employee health benefits and collective bargaining. Oral argument was held on October 11, 2017. Case information is available here.
October 27, 2017
Bursch Law files a cert. petition in the U.S. Supreme Court regarding the elements of a hostile-environment claim against a union. The petition is available here.
October 25, 2017
Benchmark Litigation names Bursch Law a "Recommended firm," one of only 12 so honored in Michigan. Benchmark also listed John as a "State litigation star." From the listing: "John Bursch is the name partner and litigator behind the curtain, boasting an impressive track record arguing before the Michigan and US Supreme Courts. . . . A client who was represented by Bursch at the federal venue praises him for delivering an "outstanding briefing and oral argument" and for providing "excellent analysis."
October 11, 2017
John argued his 27th case in the Michigan Supreme Court, involving the interplay between Michigan's cap on public-employee health benefits and collective bargaining. Additional information about the case is available here.
October 10, 2017
A study on "clutch" U.S. Supreme Court practitioners includes John on "a veritable who's who of Supreme Court litiagors," recognizing him as having the 6th highest win rate of all Supreme Court lawyers with at least four 5-4 decisions since the 2005 Term.
September 15, 2017
John is recognized with a cover picture and a featured article in the 2017 Michigan Super Lawyers magazine. The issue is available here.
September 8, 2017
Bursch Law files a cert. petition in the U.S. Supreme Court regarding the standard of review applicable to a federal district-court dismissal of a shareholder derivative action based on a Special Litigation Committee's recommendation. The petition is available here.
September 7, 2017
Bursch Law files a brief in the U.S. Supreme Court on behalf of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops and several other organizations in the Masterpiece Cakeshop case. The brief is available here.
September 7, 2017
John argues in the Michigan Court of Appeals regarding the right of intervenors to challenge the Michigan "Blaine Amendment" in response to lawsuit that asserts the Amendment as a reason to strike down state reimbursement for nonpublic-school health and safety mandates.
August 23, 2017
The Wall Street Journal provides coverage regarding Bursch Law's defense of an Indiana statute that prohibits the transfer of aborted fetal body parts or tissue. The article is available here.
August 22, 2017
The Detroit Free Press provides an update on the Tesla litigation. Coverage available here.
August 17, 2017
The Best Lawyers in America recognize John for his excellence in three categories: (1) Appellate Litigation, (2) Commercial Litigation, and (3) Bet-the-Company Litigation. More details about the honor are availabe here and here.
August 15, 2017
Bursch Law successfully upholds the district lines for Texas Congressional District 23 on behalf of U.S. Congressman Will Hurd in the Texas redistricting litigation, even though the special three-judge panel strikes down other districts challenged in the lawsuit. The opinion is available here.
July 28, 2017
Bursch Law files a cert. petition on behalf of a defendant who was forced to make the Hobson's choice of proceeding to trial with appointed counsel who was unprepared or representing himself. The cert. petition is available here.
July 12, 2017
John is recognized with his record 7th and 8th "Distinguished Brief Award" for briefing submitted to the Michigan Supreme Court. Detail about the Award and the honored briefs is available here. A Legal News report about the recognition ceremony is available here.
July 3, 2017
Bursch Law files a cert. petition involving a massive land-in-trust decision in upstate New York. Law 360 provides coverage and a description of the dispute here.
June 27, 2017
John discusses with the Michigan media the potential effect that the U.S. Supreme Court's Trinity Lutheran decision may have on the pending lawsuit challenging Michigan appropriations to reimburse private schools for state safety mandates. Coverage is available here and here.
June 27, 2017
John is quoted in a Washington Post article regarding new U.S. Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and his impact on the Court. The article is available here.
June 23, 2017
U.S. Supreme Court issues 6-2 decision in favor of Bursch Law client Jae Lee in important constitutional case regarding ineffective assistance of counsel in the plea bargaining process. The opinion is available here. Media coverage of the big victory by the Washington Post, The New York Times, and SCOTUSblog is available here, here, and here.
May 8, 2017
Empirical SCOTUS recognizes John Bursch of Bursch Law PLLC as one of the firms most frequently arguing before the U.S. Supreme Court during its 2016 Term. The article is available here.
Bursch Law filed a U.S. Supreme Court amicus brief in support of a cert. petition challenging California's law requiring pro-life pregnancy resource centers to post signs informing clients where they can obtain a state-funded abortion. The brief was on behalf of Care Net, an affiliated network of more than 1,100 pro-life pregnancy resource centers around the nation. The brief is available here.
April 11, 2017
Bursch Law moves to intervene in a lawsuit filed by the ACLU challenging Michigan's appropriation of $2.5 million to reimburse nonpublic schools for complying with state health and safety mandates. Intervenors include members of the Michigan House and Senate, a nonpublic school, and parents of numerous children attending public and nonpublic schools. The intervention paperwork is available here.
March 28, 2017
John argued Lee v. United States in the U.S. Supreme Court. There was extensive media coverage. SCOTUSBlog's analysis is available here. The Washington Post's coverage is available here. The Associated Press report is available here. A decision is expected no later than June 30, 2017.
March 20, 2017
Bursch Law filed its merits reply brief in Lee v. United States, a U.S. Supreme Court case that John will argue on March 28th. The question involves the standard for proving prejudice when counsel provides incorrect advice regarding the deportation consequences of a plea agreement. The brief is available here.
March 15, 2017
John argued in the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit on behalf of Ms. Tanganeka Phillips and against the UAW International in a case involving whether labor organizations can be sued by their members for hostile-environment claims under Title VII. The oral argument audio is available here.
March 10, 2017
Bursch Law files a cert. petition in Winget v. JPMorgan Chase, raising questions involving waiver, appeals, and the scope of the mandate. The petition is available here.
March 8, 2017
John argued in the Michigan Supreme Court on behalf of Mando America Corporation in the Michigan Supreme Court in a case involving the standard for waiving a contractual arbitration clause. Information about the case is available here. The oral-argument video is available here.
March 1, 2017
Bursch Law files a cert. petition in Black v. Dixie Consumer Products, asking the U.S. Supreme Court to limit the scope of the collateral-order doctrine. The petition is available here.
February 21, 2017
The Michigan Court of Appeals rules in favor of Bursch Law client Dr. Sanjay Bhansali in a dispute involving the Estates and Protected Individuals Code (EPIC). The opinion is available here.
February 15, 2017
Bursch Law files reply brief in support of cert. petition asking the U.S. Supreme Court to recognize a First Amendment right to cameras in the courtroom. Brief available here.
February 7, 2017
John argued in the Michigan Court of Appeals on behalf of Dr. Sanjay Bhansali in a dispute under the Estates and Protected Individuals Code (EPIC), Bhansali v. Hasings City Bank, et al.
January 25, 2017
Bursch Law recognized here for number of SCOTUS cert. grants in the 2016 Term.
January 12, 2017
Bursch Law prevails on behalf of Owners Insurance in an $82 million dispute regarding the pollution-exclusion clause in an insurance policy. The Eighth Circuit's opinion is available here.
January 9, 2017
Bursch Law files a cert. petition asking the U.S. Supreme Court to recognize a First Amendment right to record public judicial proceedings. The petition in McKay v. Federspiel is available here.
December 14, 2016
The U.S. Supreme Court grants certiorari in Lee v. United States; this will be the second Bursch Law merits case of the 2016 SCOTUS Term (both times representing petitioner).
December 13, 2016
Empirical SCOTUS compares U.S. Supreme Court records of various attorneys on the short list for U.S. Solicitor General, including Bursch Law. Blog post available here.
December 6-7, 2016
John successfully argued in the Michigan Court of Appeals and federal court to shut down the frivolous presidential-election recount in Michigan. Coveragle availabe here.
October 31, 2016
John argued his 10th U.S. Supreme Court case today on behalf of the petitioner in Star Athletica v. Varsity Brands, a dispute regarding copyright separability. Media coverage of the argument was substantial. SCOTUSblog's argument analysis is available here. Coverage is also available from The Wall Street Journal (here); the New York Times (here); Fortune (here); and the Washington Post (here), among many others.
October 20, 2016
Michigan Court of Appeals rules in favor of Bursch Law client Peter Karmanos in case John argued on October 11, affirming $16 million judgment. Opinion available here.
October 18, 2016
John argued on behalf of defendants-appellants in Chase Bank v. Winget in the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit today. The case is a $400 million+ commercial dispute over a guaranty. The oral argument audio is available here.
October 16, 2016
MiBiz article regarding Tesla's lawsuit against the State of Michigan available here.
October 11, 2016
John argued in the Michigan Court of Appeals today on behalf of plaintiff-appellee in Karmanos v. Compuware, a contract and tort case involving a $16 million arbitration award.
October 6, 2016
John argued two separate cases in the Michigan Supreme Court today, his 24th and 25th. The argument video in Kemp v. Farm Bureau Insurance, a No-Fault case, is available here (representing defendant Farm Bureau). The argument video for McClain v. City of Lansing Fire Department, a gross negligence case, is available here (representing the plaintiff estate).
October 5, 2016
John argued two consolidated cases on behalf of Consumers Energy in the Michigan Supreme Court today, City of Coldwater v. Consumers Energy and City of Holland v. Consumers Energy. The argument video is available here.
September 22, 2016
Bursch Law PLLC files a complaint on behalf of Tesla Motors in the W.D. Mich. regarding the constitutionality of Michigan's law that prohibits a vehicle manufacturer's direct sales to consumers without a franchised dealer. The filing is available here. National media stories about the lawsuit and Bursch Law's representation are available here, here, and here.
September 22, 2016
John presents at the ITT Chicago-Kent College of Law's Supreme Court IP Review about Star Athletica v. Varsity, a copyright dispute he will be arguing in the U.S. Supreme Court on October 31st. Additional information about the seminar is available here.
September 20, 2016
John argued Williams v. Owners Insurance in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit today. Argument audio available here.
September 6, 2016
Bursch Law PLLC files a petition for certiorari in Jae Lee v. United States, which involves a question regarding Strickland prejudice in a case where a defendant pled guilty to a mandatory, deportable offense based on counsel's misadvice. The cert. petition is available here.
September 6, 2016
Bursch Law PLLC files an amici brief in the United States Supreme Court on behalf of the Michigan Senate Majority Leader and the Michigan House Speaker in support of Secretary of State Johnson's application for a stay pending appeal in the straight-ticket balloting case. The brief is available here.
September 6, 2016
Michigan Lawyers Weekly publishes a front-page article regarding creation of Bursch Law PLLC; the story is available here (subscription required).
September 2, 2016
John Bursch quoted in WOOD TV 8 story about the straight-ticket balloting case headed for the U.S. Supreme Court. The article is available here.
August 22, 2016
The National Law Journal publishes a story about Bursch Law PLLC opening its doors , noting that John will be arguing four Michigan Supreme Court arguments this fall as well as his 10th U.S. Supreme Court argument. The story is available here.
August 1, 2016
Introducing Bursch Law PLLC, a Michigan-based boutique that conentrates on complex litigation matters involving high-stakes issues, substantial publicity, and the highest levels of the court system. With a regular U.S. Supreme Court practice and a dominant Michigan Supreme Court presence, Bursch Law represents some of the nation's largest and most respected companies as well as States, Governors, Attorney Generals, and other public officials.